Enes Paker - Work & Notes
Founder at Crea, Inc. Based in the San Francisco Bay Area.
Notes on what I'm thinking about, learning, and exploring.
I don’t see these as final answers. They are ideas in motion, shaped by books, conversations, work, and life. Writing helps me structure my thinking. Sharing creates room for better questions, different perspectives, and conversations I might not have found otherwise.
Recent
-
Share ↗
Business partnerships often remind me of marriage, not because they are the same, but because both create a kind of shared gravity.
When two people are deeply tied together, their actions stop being isolated. Anger, fear, ego, silence, avoidance, resentment, all of it travels through the system. In a marriage, hurting your spouse often means hurting the life you have built together. There may be children, finances, history, family, and identity involved. The relationship creates a practical truth: even when emotions are high, damage is rarely one-sided.
I think there is something worth carrying into business partnerships from that idea.
A good partnership cannot rely only on good intentions. Good intentions are important, but they are fragile under pressure. People get tired. People feel misunderstood. People start comparing effort, recognition, control, money, risk, and sacrifice. Even decent people can behave poorly when incentives are unclear or when the structure rewards self-protection over shared success.
That is where aligned incentives matter.
The point is not to replace morality with mechanics. It is not to say people should behave well only because it benefits them. The point is that mature partnerships should not depend entirely on everyone being at their best every day. A well-designed partnership creates a system where protecting the other person, protecting the company, and protecting yourself are not competing instincts.
The best partnerships seem to combine character, aligned incentives, and operating discipline. Not because conflict disappears, but because the relationship has enough structure to carry pressure without turning every disagreement into personal damage.
-
Share ↗
Every person seems to have one or more core drivers: deep motivational forces that shape what they pursue, avoid, admire, fear, and repeatedly choose. They may come from temperament, family, environment, trauma, or years of reinforcement. Over time, they become part of identity.
You can act against a core driver, but it usually creates friction. Self-awareness does not remove the drive. It just helps you ask better questions: should I work with it, redirect it, or pay the cost of changing it?
And not every cost is worth paying. We cannot fight on every front. Mental, emotional, and physical energy are limited. So the question may not only be “Can I change this?” but also “Is this worth changing?” Is this pattern causing real harm to me or to others, damaging trust, relationships, health, or long-term goals? Or is it simply making life slightly imperfect?
For example, if someone has a strong drive to contribute ideas in meetings, they may speak often, push the conversation forward, or come across as intense. But what is actually happening? Are they making others feel unheard, shutting down collaboration, or creating tension? Or are they simply energetic, engaged, and fast-moving? Should the goal be to suppress that driver, or to express it with more awareness?
The point may not be to become a different person in every possible way. Maybe the point is to understand which parts of ourselves need discipline, which parts need redirection, and which parts can be accepted without turning every imperfection into a battle.
-
Share ↗
Comparison is natural.
It is one of the ways we understand the world. When we describe something unfamiliar, we usually compare it to something known. A peach is like a softer, juicier apple with a different kind of sweetness. Comparison gives the mind a bridge.
The same thing happens internally. We compare to orient ourselves, inspect where we are, and understand what something means.
But comparison has two very different forms.
Some comparisons only give context. Where you were born, your family, your height, your starting point, parts of your natural makeup. They may explain something, but if there is no useful action available, staying there can become rumination.
Other comparisons can become teachers.
Looking at someone successful in your field can be useful if the question is not "why am I not them?" but "what can I learn from how they think, operate, communicate, build, or make decisions?"
The trap is envying someone's outcome without seeing the full picture of their life. We usually compare our entire reality to the visible part of someone else's.
Comparison is useful when it creates learning. It becomes costly when it only creates self-punishment.
-
Share ↗
Reading a good book and having a good therapy session have something in common.
In both, you rarely hear something completely new. More often, you hear a clearer version of thoughts that were already scattered somewhere in your mind.
The value is in the structure.
A book gives you a lens. Therapy gives you guided attention. Both create time to look at something directly instead of letting it stay vague in the background.
You may not normally think about an idea like financial freedom being a spectrum, not a binary state, unless something gives you the space and language to explore it.
Sometimes insight is not discovery. It is recognition, organized well.
Newsletter
Get new notes by email.